Daily Kos

SUBSCRIBE! (or exclude from AdBlock)

If you use ad blocking software while viewing Daily Kos, you're getting all the benefits of our site but we're not getting any of the advertisement revenue associated with your visits. This site relies on ad revenue for daily operations: a decrease in the number of ads seen means a decrease in the funding available to run the site, to pay those that work on it, and to create improved site features.

We won't stop you from using ad blocking software, but if you do use it we ask you to support Daily Kos another way: by purchasing a site subscription. A subscription is an inexpensive way to support the site that eliminates the advertisements without using ad blocking software.

Revenue generated from the subscriptions goes to the Daily Kos fellowship program, providing a steady income for bloggers and allowing them to concentrate full time on expanding the reach and influence of the netroots through a variety of projects.

By using ad blocking software, you may be hiding the site ads but you're also reducing the site's primary source of revenue. So if you must use one, please do your part to support the site and the people that bring it to you by purchasing a site subscription today.

To exclude Daily Kos from Adblock Plus, in Firefox click Tools > Adblock Plus > click on Add Filter, and copy/paste @@http://*dailykos.com/* to the field, then click Add Filter at the bottom of the window, then OK.

Live Map
 

Abbreviated Pundit Round-Up

Tue Dec 02, 2008 at 03:30:06 AM PST

Your one stop pundit shop.

Richard Cohen lays out a rather compelling case against the nomination of Eric Holder for Attorney General.

Robert Kagan wants a new coalition of the willing to take over parts of Pakistan. And if that goes as well as the invasion of Iraq that Kagan cheerleaded for, we will soon be mired in three wars.

Bob Herbert, while admiring the people Barack Obama is surrounding himself with, is uneasy, and wants to know:

... who in the Obama administration will be listening to the young girl on the South Side of Chicago whose future is constrained by a lousy public school, and the factory worker in Toledo whose family’s future has been trampled by unrestrained corporate greed and unfair trade policies.

All the evidence is that the next administration will be competent and smart as hell. Now I’d like to know for whom they plan to deliver.

Clarence Page argues that far from helping Barack Obama stay in touch with people outside of his bubble, continuing to use his BlackBerry would actually increases his isolation from differing viewpoints, and that it's time to put down the CrackBerry pipe.

Tony Blankley whines that we still don't know who Barack Obama is, and it's the damn media's fault for not telling us before it got him elected.

Bret Stephens self-righteously claims that "Media Narratives Feed Terrorist Fantasies," and uses as an example, a 2005 Newsweek story:

...about the Quran being flushed down a Guantanamo toilet. Result: At least 15 people were killed in Afghan riots.

...and wraps up by saying:

Of course, it's always possible to fall for a well-told lie.

Indeed. From a 2005 Defense Department press briefing, General Richard Myers, the then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff:

It's the -- it's a judgment of our commander in Afghanistan, General Eikenberry, that in fact the violence that we saw in Jalalabad was not necessarily the result of the allegations about disrespect for the Koran -- and I'll get to that in just a minute -- but more tied up in the political process and the reconciliation process that President Karzai and his Cabinet is conducting in Afghanistan.  So that's -- that was his judgment today in an after- action of that violence.  He didn't -- he thought it was not at all tied to the article in the magazine.

But hey, why let facts get in the way of your outrage?

William McGurn joins the coordinated chorus of union bashing.

Michael Canfield argues for a $25 billion loan to Detroit.

Derrick Z. Jackson, reacting to another one of George Bush's last-minute rules changes, wants another kind of bailout:

Obama helped bail out gluttonous Wall Street and is working on incompetent Detroit. He worked hard to bring rival Hillary Clinton into his administration. Now he needs to publicly and personally urge Bush to not utterly abandon the American worker. The Joes and Janes of America need their own press conference. Obama should stand before them to declare that if Bush institutes the "industry-by-industry" toxics regulation, he will move as swiftly as Bush did in 2001 to kill it. It would be a strong sign that his White House will be one where the working stiff is not stiffed.

Susan Taylor Martin gives a brief primer on Secretary of State.

Open Thread and Diary Rescue

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 08:19:09 PM PST

Tonight's Rescue Rangers are ItsJessMe (doing double-duty!), taylormattd, YatPundit, HansScholl and srkp23 with dadanation as editor.

The annual observance

Today, December 1st, is World AIDS Day.

The rescued diaries

The regular extras

jotter brings us High Impact Diaries: November 30, 2008.

Eddie C has tonight's Top Comments 12-01-2008 Rust Never Sleeps Edition.

The reminder

Please use this as an Open Thread as well as your chance to promote your favorite diaries of the day. Respectful engagement is most welcome here. Please keep in mind that each Diary Rescue's daily purview extends from 3pm PST yesterday to 3pm PST today.

Obama National Security Team Press Conference

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 07:30:06 PM PST

Introductory remarks:

And the Q&A:

On The Clinton Appointment: More Facts, Less Drama, Please!

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 06:15:04 PM PST

Finally, someone says it.

John Isaacs, the Executive Director of the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, has written a great piece about how much Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton agree on many critical defense and foreign policy issues.

His point about the media is absolutely dead-on correct. The traditional media (and many blogs) put their manufactured drama over substance:

President-elect Barack Obama announced today that he will nominate Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY) to be Secretary of State. Selecting a former rival for the most prestigious of cabinet positions has unleashed a torrent of media coverage, most of which has focused on grossly exaggerated disagreements during the presidential campaign and behind-the-scenes political maneuvering.

This reporting misses the point. As Lt. General Robert Gard, chairman of the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, wrote recently, "It’s not Hillary, it’s the policy stupid!" Reporters tend to exaggerate conflict because it makes for more interesting copy. The fact is, however, that when it comes to foreign policy, Obama and Clinton agree far more than they disagree.

It is exceedingly frustrating to attempt a discussion about simple policy issues when there is so much O'Reilly-style shouting about The Clintons™ and their nefarious plot to get back into government so Hillary can start launching tactical nuclear weapons. The complaints that Obama is "tilting right" are ridiculous; if anyone had been paying attention during the campaign and actually read the foreign policy and defense sections of Obama's website, they would have known that Obama's choice of Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State makes perfect sense.

Isaacs carefully, patiently, and methodically lays out Obama's and Hillary's approaches to the issues. He bases his comparisons on voting records, answers to questionnaires, national security discussions in a number of op-eds, etc.

Let's look at Iraq:

Hillary Clinton's position on Iraq has been complex. She joined Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) in supporting the 2002 authorization to go to war, and although she has refused to apologize for the vote, she later said, "If I knew then what I now know, I would not have voted that way." As a presidential candidate, Clinton promised, within 60 days of taking office, to begin withdrawing troops at the rate of one or two brigades a month, with the goal of getting most combat troops out by the end of 2009.

In 2002, when he was an Illinois state senator, Barack Obama opposed the war. After he was elected to the U.S. Senate, he and Clinton both voted against early proposals by Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) and others to set a timetable for withdrawal; now both Obama and Clinton vote consistently in favor of establishing a timetable. Obama's plan for exiting Iraq would, like Clinton's, send home one or two combat brigades a month, with all combat troops out by the end of 2009. However, at an MSNBC debate in September 2007, neither Clinton nor Obama would guarantee that they would have all U.S. forces out of Iraq by the end of their first term. Both Obama and Clinton have opposed permanent bases in Iraq.

Now, for Iran:

President Bush has displayed unremitting hostility toward the radical regime dominating Iran, a country that U.S. intelligence sources report had previously been pursuing a nuclear weapons program. He branded Iran part of the "axis of evil" and promoted regime change as the preferred U.S. policy. With a few limited exceptions, the United States under Bush has refused to talk directly with Iran.

Obama and Clinton have delivered messages on Iran that were mixed. Obama promised to open a dialogue with Iran without preconditions to attempt to work out a solution. However, he called Iran "a threat to all of us" and suggested in March 2007 that the military option should remain on the table. At the same time, he said that it "would be a profound mistake for us to initiate a war with Iran" and condemned the administration's "saber-rattling" on Iran.

Clinton pledged to reach out immediately to Iran, saying, "you don't make peace with your friends. You have got to deal with ... people whose interests diverge from yours." At the same time, she indicated that she remains open to all options, including military ones. Clinton also declared: "We cannot, we should not, we must not permit Iran to build or acquire nuclear weapons." She voted for a controversial amendment offered by Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) and Lieberman that proposed labeling Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. Obama missed that vote but called the amendment a repeat of the mistakes that led to war in Iraq; however, he cosponsored an earlier bill declaring the Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization.

Please note the part that I highlighted in bold at the end. Not many people know about that particular bill that Obama co-sponsored. I would urge you to click all of the links in that paragraph, especially the last one, since it gives a little insight into Obama's thinking on Iran.

Recently, I wrote about the proposed missile defense shield in Europe. Gates is a fan of missile defense, including the shield in Europe. That should make for interesting discussions with Clinton and Obama, because, as Isaacs points out, Clinton and Obama are both wary about missile defense, and rather ambiguous about the European shield:

In 2001, the Bush administration withdrew from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty and since then has moved swiftly to deploy national missile defense interceptors in Alaska and California. The latest fiscal budget request for 2009 is $12.3 billion for all forms of missile defense.

Obama has been critical of the Bush missile defense plans: "The Bush Administration has in the past exaggerated missile defense capabilities and rushed deployments for political purposes." Clinton's position has been more ambiguous. Of three key votes in 2004, she voted in effect for missile defense once and against it twice. However, she criticized President Bush's decision in 2001 to withdraw from the ABM Treaty and both she and Obama voted for an amendment offered by Sen. Carl Levin in 2005 (the last major vote on missile defense) while McCain missed the vote. She also criticized the Bush administration of "focusing obsessively on expensive and unproven missile defense technology." Neither Clinton nor Obama has indicated plans for missile defense.

Missile Defense Site in Europe: Obama has not been clear what he would do with the Bush proposal, but indicated that he would not allow the program "to divide 'new Europe' and 'old Europe.'" It is also unclear what Clinton's position is.

Please read the rest of the piece. Isaacs discusses Obama and Clinton's similar views on nuclear non-proliferation; again, it should be interesting to see how they work with Gates on this one, as he is quite enthusiastic about the Reliable Replacement Warhead, unlike Obama and Clinton, who do not think a RRW ("new nuke") program is necessary.

I would also highly recommend the post to which Isaacs links in the first paragraph, by Lt. Gen. Robert G. Gard Jr. (USA, Ret.) and Tom Andrews.  The title says it all:

It's Not Hillary, It's the Policy Stupid!

Got that, press? Bloggers?

Good.

Because, as Obama said today:

"During campaigns or during the course of election season, differences get magnified," he said. "I did not ask for assurances from these individuals that they would agree with me at all times. I think they understand and would not be joining this team unless they understood and were prepared to carry out the decisions that have been made by me after full discussion."

"And, you know, most of the people who are standing here are people who I've worked with, and on the broad core vision of where America needs to go, we are in almost complete agreement," he continued. "There are going to be differences in tactics and different assessments and judgments made. That's what I expect; that's what I welcome. That's why I asked them to join the team."

It's time to get to work, and that's what they're going to do.

Open Thread

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 06:05:01 PM PST

Jibber jabber.

GA-Sen: Election Day is tomorrow

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 05:00:04 PM PST

Tuesday is election day in Georgia, and voters will go to the polls to either choose newer, progressive representation in the United States Senate, or return a man to the Senate so embarrassing to Republicans that even FOX's own Chris Wallace is forced to skewer him:

Democrat Jim Martin has had some great people stumping on his behalf, like retired Gen. Claudia Kennedy:

Kennedy is the first female three-star general in the U-S Amy and is reaching out to veterans for Martin who served in Vietnam. "Jim Martin believes that we should have better body armor for our soldiers and should have better G. I. Bill benefits," said Kennedy.

Things that are also important to Alva James, who is also Vietnam veteran. "I have some veteran friends who are really in need of medical help."

"Jim Martin has gone to war and he knows the impact that it has on people,and knows the importance of having a strong veteran affairs program," said Kennedy.

Today, Sarah Palin will be Chamblissing in metro Atlanta (and fundraising at "tony hotels"...so Martin counters by campaigning all over the state, with a sharper and shrewder political mind, that of musician (and Atlanta native) Chris "Ludacris" Bridges:

Palin will appear at public rallies in Augusta, Savannah and Perry, and in metro Atlanta at the Gwinnett Center at 4 p.m.

Jim Martin will spend the day on a statewide bus tour that will take him from a MARTA stop in Atlanta in the morning to Augusta, then Macon and back to a rally at the state Capitol at 5:30 p.m. with civil rights veterans and hip-hop star Ludacris.

Given the early-voting numbers among African-Americans, Martin needed to shore up support among the AA community, and it seems he's certainly working on that, campaigning with civil-rights legend John Lewis and fellow Representative Bennie Thompson:

At historically black Morris Brown College, surrounded by former Barack Obama campaign staffers and African American Reps. John Lewis (D-Ga.) and Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the normally unassuming, bespectacled white lawyer had discovered his inner preacher.

"We're all in this together!" Martin, 63, intoned.

"Talk to me!" a man shouted in response.

"The Republicans believe if they have 41 votes in the Senate, they can stop this great president!"

"That's right!"

"Now this isn't Landslide Jim you're talking to," Martin said. "I need your help."

President-elect Obama isn't coming to Georgia any time soon, but his Georgia field team is still in the state, working to get out every last vote.

If Jim Martin can win this thing, he needs your help. If you haven't called, call for him. If you have called, call some more. If you can't call, donate.

And keep your fingers crossed. More to come.

On the web:

On the web:
Jim Martin for U.S. Senate
Orange to Blue ActBlue Page
MyBO Phonebanking

Late Afternoon/Early Evening Open Thread

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 03:50:06 PM PST

What you missed on Sunday Kos ...

Really?

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 02:30:04 PM PST

While I won't argue that Barack Obama's vast email list isn't going to be a powerful tool during his presidency, this article seems to miss the obvious: the 13 or so million people on that list don't march in lockstep.

The millions of donors who enabled Barack Obama to shatter campaign-fundraising records and build a nationwide network of supporters may also help him rewrite the rules for governing.  [...]

"When President Obama says, '21 members of Congress are standing in the way of my health plan,' one out of 10 voting Americans start to go to work on those members of Congress,'' said Democratic consultant Joe Trippi...

We're not the Republican Party, Joe. We're not, as a group, going to jump onboard whatever policy President Obama pushes. Anyone who thinks so hasn't been paying attention.

A New Spot of Blue in Wyoming

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 01:15:04 PM PST

One of the greatest disappointments of November 4 was Wyoming, where one of our best Congressional candidates--Gary Trauner--couldn't overcome the Republican flood of a presidential election vote. But there's a very good bit of news out of that state with a Democratic legislative pick-up, coming by way of a highly unusual revote.

Democrat Jim Roscoe, a home builder, marathoner and former ski patrolman who has never run for public office ran for the open District 22 seat in the state House against Republican Charles Stough, a recent transplant. Roscoe won in the general election in a complete squeaker, by just four votes--2,991 2,891 to 2,887. But then it got kind of hinkey. Joe Albright, Teton County Democratic State Committeeman, explained what happened in an e-mail:

Even though John McCain and Sarah Palin carried the legislative district with 60.2 % of the vote on Nov. 4, Roscoe manage to run more than 10 percent ahead of the Obama-Biden ticket. He won just enough to carry the legislative district by four votes on Nov. 4.

But then the Republicans managed to find that in the Alpine precinct in the Lincoln County portion of the district, the election judges mistakenly allowed 11 voters to vote even though they lived in the adjoining legislative district. (As it turned out, all three of the election judges in Alpine that day were Republicans.) The upshot was an order Nov. 12 from the State Canvassing Board that new election had to be held Nov. 25 in the Alpine precinct where the 11 registration errors occurred.

Calling for a revote in a situation like this is highly unusual, and the Republicans were probably certain that, with just a four vote margin, they could get this one back. This district was created expressly to keep a Democrat out of the House. Here's Joe's description of it:

The district he won was a classically cynical Republican gerrymander, created by Republican state legislature after the 2000 census to be Republican forever. Intent on diluting the voting strength of the progressive town of Wilson in Teton County, the Republicans in the Legislature created House District 22 by slicing off half of Wilson and combining it with a heavily Republican swath of Lincoln and Sublette Counties. Until now, neither Lincoln or Sublette have ever been represented in the Wyoming legislature by a Democrat, at least as far as anyone can recall.

Roscoe won the revote by a 320-163 margin, on the basis of an energetic door-to-door campaign. He got almost every one of the voters who had voted for him in the general election to come back out and vote again, while the Republican turnout was dismal. It handily decided the race.

Wyoming Democrats still have a huge deficit in the state House. Republicans will have a 41-19 seat advantage over Democrats. But this win in one of the toughest districts in the state is reason to hope. This is the second House seat to flip in Wyoming in 2008. State party chair Bill Luckett is optimistic, something he probably didn't think he'd be feeling about Wyoming when he woke up on November 5:

"It just shows what we can do when we get a really good candidate who worked really hard to get his message out to the voters," Luckett said. "It's not rocket science, but it's not easy when you start with a D next to your name."

That's harder to accomplish state-wide in a presidential year, as we found out with Gary's race, where a really good candidate worked really hard but couldn't stem the tide. Roscoe's win provides a little salve to the hurt of that loss.

It's also great news looking forward in Wyoming. Wins like this will help more as the state Dems are finally getting a solid farm-team building.

Midday Open Thread

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 12:15:03 PM PST

  • Today marks the 20th anniversary of World AIDS Day, and while progress has been made over the past 20 years, there remains much to be done, from research to  training, and of course, access and affordability.
  • John Cole's take on the Republican goal of "union busting on a grand scale":

    It could not be clearer. I do not know what the best thing to do with the auto industry is, and I am sick and tired of all these bailouts. However, I do think it is important that people realize that when Republicans reject a bailout of the auto-industry, that they are not doing so out of principle. If anything should be clear, when it comes to spending, the GOP has no principles. Instead, their no vote will be about something else- protecting the big money backers, the captains of industry and the folks who, unlike everyone else, has done well in the past few years.

  • Nancy Pelosi hopes to have an economic recovery bill ready for Barack Obama's signature on January 20th.
  • It took 17 years for Gulf War syndrome to be officially recognized, but there is still no focus on treating the men and women who have been suffering for nearly two decades.
  • While the Bush administration still claims victory in Iraq, the killing continues on a daily basis.
  • Save your soul!
  • All things considered, this award really needs to change its name :

    Warren will present President Bush with the first "International Medal of PEACE" from the Global PEACE Coalition in recognition of his unprecedented contribution to the fight against HIV/AIDS and other diseases. The "International Medal of PEACE" is given for outstanding contribution toward alleviating the five global giants recognized by the Coalition, including pandemic diseases, extreme poverty, illiteracy, self-centered leadership and spiritual emptiness.

  • Condoleezza Rice is heading to India to show "solidarity" with the people of India following last week's terrorist attacks in Mombai.
  • Former Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick's partner in crime and text-messaging has pleaded guilty to perjury and obstruction of justice and was sentenced to four months in jail, five years probation, and $100,000 in fines.
  • Notice to the slobs and/or Republicans among us:

    A vigorous hand wash or shower could cause a person to be less judgmental.

    A new study, set for publication in the December issue of the journal Psychological Science, reveals that when a person feels physically clean, he or she cuts others more moral slack.


Defending The Media From Halperin's Tin-Foil Attack

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 11:15:03 AM PST

As you may have heard, a little over a week ago Mark Halperin accused the media of "extreme bias, extreme pro-Obama coverage," claiming that reporters wanted "to see his face etched in stain glass and on Mt. Rushmore simultaneously."

Since then, a wide range of commentators have challenged Halperin's tin-foil accusation -- for example: Greg Mitchell, John Cole, Andrew Sullivan, Josh Marshall, and Daily Kos contributing editor Greg Dworkin in the Politico Arena.

Perhaps the biggest problem with Halperin's claim was that he failed to offer much in the way of specifics to substantiate it, citing only a pair of articles published by the New York Times, one on Cindy McCain, the other on Michelle Obama.

Can you say cherry-picker?

The truth is that despite Halperin's breathless attack, the NYT has not demonstrated a systematic pro-Obama bias. (Sorry, Rush.)

To illustrate my point, I assembled a list of 92 articles published by the NYT in 2007 and 2008 (see below). As you can see, none of thes articles show any signs of "extreme bias" or  "extreme pro-Obama coverage."

I'm not saying the articles prove any sort of systematic anti-Obama bias. But they do invalidate Halperin's claim about the NYT, in the process exposing his claim that coverage of the 2008 campaign represents "the most disgusting failure of people in our business since the Iraq war" as totally unsubstantiated.

Given Halperin's utter lack of specifics to support his claim, the real question is this: why did he choose to throw the media under Rush Limbaugh's bus?

::: :::

Here are the 92 NYT articles (in chronological order):

1/18/07: A long line of Democrats, Republicans and independents have gone before him, casting themselves as the sparkling candidate of the new politics only to find that their freshness withers well before the balloting begins.

2/2/07: He is hailed by his supporters as the hope of an increasingly multicultural nation, a political phenomenon who can wow white voters while carrying the aspirations of African-Americans all the way to the White House. So why are some black voters so uneasy about Senator Barack Obama?

2/12/07: On his first trip to Iowa as a presidential candidate, Senator Barack Obama, Democrat of Illinois, found himself responding to an unexpected critic: John Howard, Australia's prime minister.

3/3/07: Genealogists have uncovered a new ingredient in the melting pot identity of Senator Barack Obama, the Illinois Democrat who hopes to become the first black president. His white maternal ancestors once owned slaves.

3/6/07: The Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., senior pastor of the popular Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago and spiritual mentor to Senator Barack Obama, thought he knew what he would be doing on Feb. 10, the day of Senator Obama's presidential announcement. After all, back in January, Mr. Obama had asked Mr. Wright if he would begin the event by delivering a public invocation. But Mr. Wright said Mr. Obama called him the night before the Feb. 10 announcement and rescinded the invitation to give the invocation.

3/7/07: Less than two months after ascending to the United States Senate, Barack Obama bought more than $50,000 worth of stock in two speculative companies whose major investors included some of his biggest political donors. One of the companies was a biotech concern that was starting to develop a drug to treat avian flu. In March 2005, two weeks after buying about $5,000 of its shares, Mr. Obama took the lead in a legislative push for more federal spending to battle the disease.

3/8/07: Senator Barack Obama said Wednesday that he did not believe it was a conflict of interest to seek investment advice and use the brokerage services recommended by a friend and political contributor. He said he had not been aware that his broker had invested up to $100,000 in two companies backed by some of his top donors.

5/26/07: The decision by two of the leading Democratic presidential candidates to vote against a bill providing more money for the war in Iraq because it did not set a timetable to withdraw the troops reverberated on the campaign trail yesterday, underscoring the deep divisions over the war between Democrats and Republicans. The two Democrats, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and Senator Barack Obama, quickly found their votes attacked by Republicans.

6/14/07: Back in the 1990s, Mr. Rezko's office was adorned with framed photos of candidates he viewed as up-and-comers. Among them was Barack Obama, a state legislator whose first campaign donations included $2,000 from Mr. Rezko's companies. As Mr. Obama built a career that carried him to the Senate in 2004, Mr. Rezko was there with him, holding fund-raisers and rallying support.

8/3/07: Senator Barack Obama found himself on the defensive again yesterday about his views on foreign policy, this time over a comment he made about the use of nuclear weapons in Afghanistan or Pakistan.

8/17/07: The recalibration of the campaign is a marked departure from a laid-back tone Mr. Obama often had taken in the first six months of his candidacy. It comes as he is working to persuade voters of his judgment and erase perceptions among party leaders in states like this that Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York is establishing herself as the front-runner after a series of debates and what some Democrats have viewed as slip-ups by Mr. Obama.

Just a reminder on that MN Senate seat...

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 10:15:04 AM PST

As Scout Finch pointed out in yesterday's Midday Open Thread, the ultimate arbiter of the Minnesota Senate election (and indeed every Senate election) is... the Senate itself.

So here's a little reminder of what looms in the background of the whole Minnesota Senate recount mess:

The Minnesota U.S. Senate contest between incumbent Republican Norm Coleman and Democratic challenger Al Franken is undergoing a recount, with the candidates separated by less than 300 votes out of 2.9 million cast. But a controversial decision by the state's Elections Canvassing Board could end up throwing the election into the lap of the Senate itself, a scholar told Minnesota Public Radio.

"Ultimately, the Senate has complete authority to determine who was elected," Washington University political scientist Steven Smith told the broadcaster, citing the canvassing board's decision this week to disallow disputed absentee ballots that Franken had urged be counted.

The board's move was "a cause for great concern," Reid said this week, and those comments may indicate his willingness to start a Senate investigation of the Minnesota recount, Smith said. And if so, it's possible that Franken's argument regarding rejected absentee ballots could be reconsidered by U.S. senators.

It's certainly true that the Senate can settle the issue by simply choosing to swear in one or the other, but I wouldn't necessarily agree at this point that the Senate is likely to intervene, or that Reid's comments should lead us to anticipate that. "Cause for great concern," without more, is about as boilerplate as it gets.

Whence cometh such authority? Article I, Sec. 5:

Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members

Ding. That's it.

That applies equally to determining who won elections and shall be seated, and to who is such a pain in the ass that they'll be expelled from the Senate once seated, though there's more about expulsions later, including the 2/3 vote requirement for kicking someone out.

So, has it ever happened? Sure. In fact, according to a 2005 paper (PDF) by Prof. Jeffrey A. Jenkins of Northwestern University, there have been 132 contested Senate elections through the 107th Congress, i.e., from 1789 through 2002, or an average of more than one per Congress. But since the 17th Amendment, the number of cases has declined fairly dramatically, with just 35 cases, or 0.8 per Congress on average. The last such dispute -- not included, it appears, in the Jenkins paper -- was current Senator Mary Landrieu's first election to the Senate in 1996.

Will it happen here? Dunno yet. But it's not as rare or arcane a procedure as you might think.

I'll take this opportunity to mention that the new Daily Kos Congress-watching spin-off community that we're calling Congress Matters is up and running (with a few kinks left to work out before the 111th Congress convenes). It's the kind of place where we might actually spend a day or two looking at the election dispute procedure, some past cases, etc., while waiting for the action to heat up in January.

New national security team takes a bow

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 08:56:27 AM PST

As announced earlier, Barack Obama rolled out his new national security team this morning in a press conference in Chicago. Via press release, here are his prepared remarks:

Good morning. Last week, we announced our economic team, which is working as we speak to craft an Economic Recovery Program to create jobs and grow our struggling economy. Today, Vice President-elect Biden and I are pleased to announce our national security team.

The national security challenges we face are just as grave – and just as urgent – as our economic crisis. We are fighting two wars. Old conflicts remain unresolved, and newly assertive powers have put strains on the international system. The spread of nuclear weapons raises the peril that the world’s deadliest technology could fall into dangerous hands. Our dependence on foreign oil empowers authoritarian governments and endangers our planet.

America must also be strong at home to be strong abroad. We need to provide education and opportunity for our citizens, so every American can compete with anyone, anywhere. And our economic power must sustain our military strength, our diplomatic leverage, and our global leadership.

The common thread linking these challenges is the fundamental reality that in the 21st century, our destiny is shared with the world’s. From our markets to our security; from our public health to our climate –we must act with the understanding that, now more than ever, we have a stake in what happens across the globe. And as we learned so painfully on 9/11, terror cannot be contained by borders, nor safety provided by oceans alone.

Last week, we were reminded of this threat once again when terrorists took the lives of six American among nearly 200 victims in Mumbai. In the world we seek, there is no place for those who kill innocent civilians to advance hateful extremism. This weekend, I told Prime Minister Singh that Americans stand with the people of India in this dark time. And I am confident that India’s great democracy is more resilient than killers who would tear it down.

And so, in this uncertain world, the time has come for a new beginning – a new dawn of American leadership to overcome the challenges of the 21st century, and to seize the opportunities embedded in those challenges. We will strengthen our capacity to defeat our enemies and support our friends. We will renew old alliances and forge new and enduring partnerships. We will show the world once more that America is relentless in defense of our people, steady in advancing our interests, and committed to the ideals that shine as a beacon to the world: democracy and justice; opportunity and unyielding hope – because American values are America’s greatest export to the world.  

To succeed, we must pursue a new strategy that skillfully uses, balances, and integrates all elements of American power: our military and diplomacy; our intelligence and law enforcement; our economy and the power of our moral example. The team that we have assembled here today is uniquely suited to do just that.

In their past service and plans for the future, these men and women represent all of those elements of American power, and the very best of the American example. They have served in uniform and as diplomats; they have worked as legislators, law enforcement officials, and executives. They share my pragmatism about the use of power, and my sense of purpose about America’s role as a leader in the world.

I have known Hillary Clinton as a friend, a colleague, a source of counsel, and as a campaign opponent. She possesses an extraordinary intelligence and toughness, and a remarkable work ethic. I am proud that she will be our next Secretary of State. She is an American of tremendous stature who will have my complete confidence; who knows many of the world’s leaders; who will command respect in every capitol; and who will clearly have the ability to advance our interests around the world.

Hillary’s appointment is a sign to friend and foe of the seriousness of my commitment to renew American diplomacy and restore our alliances. There is much to do – from preventing the spread of nuclear weapons to Iran and North Korea, to seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Palestinians, to strengthening international institutions. I have no doubt that Hillary Clinton is the right person to lead our State Department, and to work with me in tackling this ambitious foreign policy agenda.

At a time when we face an unprecedented transition amidst two wars, I have asked Robert Gates to continue as Secretary of Defense, and I’m pleased that he’s accepted. Two years ago, he took over the Pentagon at a difficult time. He restored accountability. He won the confidence of military commanders, and the trust of our brave men and women in uniform, and their families. He earned the respect of members of Congress on both sides of the aisle for his pragmatism and competence. He knows that we need a sustainable national security strategy – and that includes a bipartisan consensus at home.

As I said throughout the campaign, I will be giving Secretary Gates and our military a new mission as soon as I take office: responsibly ending the war in Iraq through a successful transition to Iraqi control. We will also ensure that we have the strategy – and resources – to succeed against al Qaeda and the Taliban. As Bob said not too long ago, Afghanistan is where the war on terror began, and it is where it must end. And going forward, we will continue to make the investments necessary to strengthen our military and increase our ground forces to defeat the threats of the 21st century.

Eric Holder has the talent and commitment to succeed as Attorney General from his first day on the job, which is even more important in a transition that demands vigilance. He has distinguished himself as a prosecutor, a Judge, and a senior official, and he is deeply familiar with the law enforcement challenges we face– from terrorism to counter-intelligence; from white collar crime to public corruption.

Eric also has the combination of toughness and independence that we need at the Justice Department. Let me be clear: the Attorney General serves the American people. And I have every expectation that Eric will protect our people, uphold the public trust, and adhere to our Constitution.

Janet Napolitano offers the experience and executive skill that we need in the next Secretary of Homeland Security. She has spent her career protecting people – as a US Attorney, an Attorney General, and as Governor of Arizona. She understands the need for a Department of Homeland Security that has the capacity to help prevent terrorist attacks and respond to catastrophe – be it manmade or natural.

Janet assumes this critical role having learned the lessons – some of them painful – of the last several years, from 9/11 to Katrina. She insists on competence and accountability. She knows firsthand the need to have a partner in Washington that works well with state and local governments. She understands as well as anyone the danger of an unsecure border. And she will be a leader who can reform a sprawling Department while safeguarding our homeland.

Susan Rice will take on the crucial task of serving as Permanent Representative of the United States to the United Nations. Susan has been a close and trusted advisor. As in previous Administrations, the UN Ambassador will serve as a member of my cabinet and integral member of my team. Her background as a scholar, on the National Security Council, and Assistant Secretary of State will serve our nation well at the United Nations.

Susan knows that the global challenges we face demand global institutions that work. She shares my belief that the UN is an indispensable – and imperfect – forum. She will carry the message that our commitment to multilateral action must be coupled with a commitment to reform. We need the UN to be more effective as a venue for collective action – against terror and proliferation; climate change and genocide; poverty and disease.

Finally, I am convinced that General James Jones is uniquely suited to be a strong and skilled National Security Advisor. Generations of Joneses have served heroically on the battlefield – from the beaches of Tarawa in World War II, to Foxtrot Ridge in Vietnam. Jim’s Silver Star is a proud part of that legacy. He will bring to the job the dual experience of serving in uniform and as a diplomat. He has commanded a platoon in battle, served as Supreme Allied Commander in a time of war, and worked on behalf of peace in the Middle East.

Jim is focused on the threats of today and the future. He understands the connection between energy and national security, and has worked on the frontlines of global instability – from Kosovo to northern Iraq to Afghanistan. He will advise me and work effectively to integrate our efforts across the government, so that we are effectively using all elements of American power to defeat unconventional threats and promote our values.

I am confident that this is the team that we need to make a new beginning for American national security. This morning, we met to discuss the situation in Mumbai and some of the challenges that we face in the months and years ahead.  In the coming weeks, I will be in close contact with these advisors, who will be working with their counterparts in the Bush Administration to make sure that we are ready to hit the ground running on January 20. Given the range of threats that we face – and the vulnerability that can be a part of every presidential transition – I hope that we can proceed swiftly for those national security officials who demand confirmation.

We move forward with the humility that comes with knowing that there are brave men and women protecting us on the front lines. Troops serving their second, third, or fourth tours. Diplomats and intelligence officers in dangerous corners of the world. FBI agents in the field, cops on the beat, prosecutors in our courts, and cargo inspectors at our ports. These selfless Americans whose names are unknown to most of us will form the backbone of our effort. If we serve as well as they do, we will protect our country and promote our values.

And we move forward with respect for America’s tradition of a bipartisan national security policy, and a commitment to national unity. When it comes to keeping our nation and our people safe, we are not Republicans and we are not Democrats: we are Americans. There is no monopoly of power or wisdom in either party. Together, as one nation, as one people, we can shape our times instead of being shaped by them. Together, we will meet the challenges of the 21st century not with fear, but with hope.

In addition to the prepared remarks, the Obama transition team sent out bios of today's appointees, and it's interesting to note what's emphasized (and what's not) in these official life stories. Particularly intriguing is the fact that Napolitano's bio is longer than that of Gates -- and that it emphasizes quite a few domestic policies that at least on the face of it have little to do with Homeland Security as we know it. When the number of words are limited in introducing people to a national audience, it's interesting to choose such points as creating a new grade in public schools and shoring up kindergarten (worthy endeavors, mind you, but hard to see how they help bolster Homeland Security experience.)

The full bios are beneath the fold for similar analysis.

Another RNC Candidate

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 07:49:47 AM PST

Republicans just don't get it. Katon Dawson, the chairman of the South Carolina Republican Party, the latest candidate to throw his hat into the ring to become the next head of the Republican National Committee, is disappointed that his party is out of power. He agrees that it needs new ideas and direction. His solution?

Renew our commitment to our Party’s timeless principles...by reconfirming our commitment to be the party of smaller government, lower taxes, individual freedom, strong national security, respect for the sanctity of life, traditional marriage, the importance of family and the exceptionalism of America.

Sounds familiar, doesn't it? Pretend they are for smaller government, although they never seem to do anything about it when they're in power, lower taxes for big business and the weathy, and of course, red meat for the base: God, guns and gays.

With this kind of change, 2010 is looking good...for the Democrats.

Obama Set To Announce Security Team

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 06:30:03 AM PST

According to several reports, Senator Clinton will be in Chicago today to be formally named as the nominee for Secretary of State. According to Beth Fouhy with the AP, the Obama team negotiated with Bill Clinton to set the following terms:

To make it possible for his wife to become the top U.S. diplomat, the officials said, former President Clinton agreed:
_to disclose the names of every contributor to his foundation since its inception in 1997 and all contributors going forward.
_to refuse donations from foreign governments to the Clinton Global Initiative, his annual charitable conference.
_to cease holding CGI meetings overseas.
_to volunteer to step away from day-to-day management of the foundation while his wife is secretary of state.
_to submit his speaking schedule to review by the State Department and White House counsel.
_to submit any new sources of income to a similar ethical review.

In addition to Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, it is expected Obama will name retired Marine General James M. Jones to serve as national security adviser and formally announce Robert Gates will stay on as Sec of Defense for at least a year.

Cheers and Jeers: Monday

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 05:59:55 AM PST

From the GREAT STATE OF MAINE...

Morning Eve

Recommended diaries goddess nyceve graduated from Barnard College (Columbia University), where she majored in Economics. She spends some of her time learning about the healthcare crisis first-hand at a hospital in Manhattan, volunteering with an oncologist and his patients to help them obtain hard-won insurance company approvals for treatments and medications. With healthcare reform a top priority of the Obama administration, hers will be an important voice here for helping us make sense of it all. For now, though, she gets the dreaded interview treatment in our Pulitzer-snubbed series, Yes, We're All Staring At YOU!

Cheers and Jeers: How long have you been blogging and what brought you to Daily Kos?
Nyceve:
A long time, my User ID is 21195. I don't know exactly where that places me---maybe 2003 or 2004, but I'm an old-timer. I remember how I found Daily Kos, and I didn't lurk for ages, like some do, then register. I just registered. I read about Daily Kos in an article on the New York Times, this was during the early days of the Bush regime. I thought to myself, this sounds like a place I might find some equally horrified kindred spirits. So I ran up to my computer, (it was such a transformative moment in my life,  that I remember I was at my mother's house in Los Angeles), I turned on my computer, typed in "www.dailykos.com." got here and registered.

By the way, I made a fool of myself in some of those early diaries. This was in the days before we could save drafts.  And for those new people, in those early days, we could post two diaries a day.

Where were you when the networks called the race for Barack Obama and how did you react?
I'll never forget. I went to my dear friend's home for dinner on Election night. She lives on the East Side of Manhattan and I live on the West Side. She had taken me as her guest to the 1992 Convention when Bill Clinton was nominated and we wanted to spend this historic night together. A little before 11, we all got tired and she had an early appointment the next morning so I decided to go home.  I was on the 66th Street crosstown bus in NYC and my phone rang, it was my sister she screamed,"we won!"  The bus was about half filled, I yelled out, "Oh my God we won!"  The whole bus started applauding and screaming. I went over to the bus driver who happened to be African American, there were tears streaming down his face. He looked at me and said, "Praise the Lord." I said, "Amen".

When did you first become focused on health care and why?
This is an easy one. It was early November, 2005. I came home from my office and had a letter from my insurance company. I went to my apartment and opened it---the bastards had canceled my insurance! I didn't know what to do. I was scared. I called my Democratic New York State assemblyman, who I had never in my life bothered for anything (he also happens to be the Chairman of the New York State Assembly Health Committee), and his office was essentially worthless. They couldn't help me. So in desperation I wrote a diary called, "My Health Insurance was Cancelled." About a week later I wrote another diary called, "Finding Insurance has Become My Full Time Job." The rest, as they say, is history. The bastards picked the wrong person to f*ck with.

Truthfully, I'm obsessed with this catastrophe. I'm a fairly logical person, and there is no nuance in this for me. Healthcare must be a right for every last one of us, not a privilege. Being able to afford to pay for health insurance has nothing in the world to do with the concept of delivering affordable and guaranteed cradle-to-grave healthcare to all Americans. No one should ever fear financial ruin due to an illness or accident. Period. No nuance. Let's just do it, and do it correctly.

On a scale of one to ten, how hopeful are you that significant changes will be made to our health care system during the Obama administration?
I'm very optimistic. I'm inclined to go with a 10, but I need a little wiggle room, so I'll say a 9.2. I've said many times, the U.S. political system was designed to respond to crisis. We have more than a crisis today, we have a catastrophe---it's now or never. But sadly, it won't be single payer healthcare on day one. I do believe we'll get to single payer, which is the gold standard for an advanced industrialized nation, such as ours, but it will take some time. The insurance industry is still too strong and throws too much money at politicians. I hope that President Obama really presses for a well funded public alternative which will compete with the for-profits. I also hope the playing field will be level---we can't put all the sick people in the public option. The for-profits must be required to take everyone. Let's see some real competition between the for-profits and a Medicare alternative. I think if President Obama establishes some inviolate ground rules, we will drain the life and the profits out of the for-profits. This would be ideal.

On a scale of one to ten, how cool is it to be able to say, "The Obama administration?"
It's a 20. We did our country proud. I think in a very profound sense, Mr. Bush gave us the courage as a nation to put aside any lingering racial issues and vote for Barack Obama. The corruption, incompetence, and catastrophic mismanagement of everything Bush and Co. touched, paved the way for President Obama. I'm able to sleep again.

It's hard to articulate how unmoored I felt as an American citizen these last eight years. I lived through Reagan, Nixon, etc. Nothing approached  the horror of thinking this was no longer my country. Trying to pick a low point from 2000 to now, is almost impossible---there were so many.  But I will say the images of Katrina are haunting and etched on my brain.

What kind of music makes you feel invincible to the GOP horde?
I'm very patriotic so I'd say the National Anthem. I also love Woody Guthrie's This Land is My Land, Bob Dylan Blowin in the Wind, John Lennon singing Imagine, Eric Clapton's Tears in Heaven and Louis Armstrong, What a Wonderful World.

Why hasn’t there been more of a push by private employers to turn the health insurance system over to the government?
I think it's finally happening before our eyes. We're losing our competitiveness. Healthcare costs are unsustainable---employers are shifting healthcare costs onto the shoulders of already heavily cash-strapped workers. The only way employers are able to continue providing benefits is to increase deductibles, co-pays, etc. So we all have what amounts to junk insurance---insurance in name only. Americans are delaying medical treatment because they know that even if they have so-called "insurance", they could be left with huge bills, so they don't get care. And these are people with insurance! The effects of  policy makers ignoring the healthcare crisis for so long are finally coming home to roost in a big and ugly way.

What's the one book every Kossack must read?
I'd say anything by Frances Fox Piven and Richard A. Cloward.

Finish this sentence: In the kitchen I make a mean...
I'm going to give you a long list because I like to cook. Brisket, lasagna, grilled salmon, French Toast with Challah, an old Jewish recipe--egg noodles and cottage cheese, tuna salad, pesto sauce, chocolate Mousse (out of this world), lentils and brown rice, fettucine with ripe, raw tomatoes, basil, capers and calamata olives, with a little grated Pecorino Romano. I would say turkey but after seeing the Palin slaughter, I'll never eat or cook turkey again. Moving along, I'm a pasta addict and my best friend is Italian and he says for a Jewish girl I make one insanely delicious bowl of perfectly al dente spaghetti. I also love tofu and I've just done a new recipe with fresh chopped garlic, ginger, sesame oil,  scallions, low sodium soy sauce and a dash of seasoned Japanese vinegar.

Tom Daschle has been nominated to be Secretary of Health and Human Services. Good choice?
Better than Mr. Leavitt. Truthfully, Daschle is committed to reform...now we have to be sure the Obama Administration delivers something big, bold and what's in the best interests of the American people, not the insurance industry.

No waffling here: dogs or cats?
Both. Love 'em all. Grew up in a not huge, but not tiny New York City apartment with three cats, a large collie, black lab mix, two parakeets and three turtles. This is true.

I have one question left, but it's time for me to go over and massage Old Man McGillicutty's goiter. Please ask and answer the final question yourself...

Will healthcare reform include dental care?
It better. Last time I was at a dentist I was charged $650.00 for a filling. One filling! Then I had to pay extra for the sedation gas. If this isn't the definition of catastrophe, then I don't know what is.

Cheers and Jeers starts in There's Moreville... [Swoosh!!] RIGHTNOW! [Gong!!]

Poll

Are you sending out holiday cards this year?

11%1066 votes
34%3172 votes
45%4258 votes
8%814 votes

| 9310 votes | Vote | Results

Open Thread

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 05:45:02 AM PST

Jibber jabber.

Your Abbreviated Pundit Round-up

Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 04:43:13 AM PST

Monday... time to go back to work, pundits.

Paul Krugman:

The idea that tight fiscal policy when the economy is depressed actually reduces private investment isn’t just a hypothetical argument: it’s exactly what happened in two important episodes in history.

The first took place in 1937, when Franklin Roosevelt mistakenly heeded the advice of his own era’s deficit worriers. He sharply reduced government spending, among other things cutting the Works Progress Administration in half, and also raised taxes. The result was a severe recession, and a steep fall in private investment.

The second episode took place 60 years later, in Japan. In 1996-97 the Japanese government tried to balance its budget, cutting spending and raising taxes. And again the recession that followed led to a steep fall in private investment.

Neal Gabler: Goldwater-Reagan-Bush? Nah. McCarthy-Nixon-Reagan-Bush-Palin.

Republicans continue to push the idea that this is a center-right country and that Americans have swooned for GOP anti-government posturing all these years, but the real electoral bait has been anger, recrimination and scapegoating. That's why John McCain kept describing Barack Obama as some sort of alien and why Palin, taking a page right out of the McCarthy playbook, kept pushing Obama's relationship with onetime radical William Ayers.

Roger Cohen: Bringing some tough love (make love, not war) to Israel would be a good thing for the new foreign policy team. Ehud Olmert, the outgoing Israeli prime minister, thinks so.

William Kristol: Before he goes, Bush should pardon every fool patriot who thought torture was a good idea. And the public needs to pardon the biggest fool of all me for thinking Bush's legacy is capable of being polished.

William Kristol: I know, I know. You can't get enough of me. But if I keep yapping about terrorism and scaring people, I can prove Gabler right.

AP:

"I think he's moving center-left, rather than left-center. It's fair to call him pragmatic," said Paul Light, a public policy professor and presidential historian at New York University. "I think labor is going to get a lot from him. I think his liberal supporters are going to get a lot from him. But they're going to be disappointed if they want all liberal all the time."

David Yepsen: Huckabee and Jindal do Iowa.

These prescriptions come none too soon for the GOP. A Gallup poll taken after the November election and released last week showed "the Republican Party's image has gone from bad to worse" since the election. Only 34 percent of Americans say they have a favorable view of the party, and 61 percent view it unfavorably - the worst image rating in a decade.

By contrast, 55 percent view the Democratic Party with favor, and only 39 percent look upon that party unfavorably.

Matthew Alexander (interrogator):

Torture and abuse are against my moral fabric. The cliche still bears repeating: Such outrages are inconsistent with American principles. And then there's the pragmatic side: Torture and abuse cost American lives.

Julian Selizer: Americans are watching the extraordinary sight of two presidents working at once. And it's not a bad thing.

Andrew Malcom: What's a small donor? And only 32 months until the Ames [IA] straw poll. [original research here, h/t Scarce]


:: Next 18

Goal Thermometer






Support Bloggers' Rights!
Support Bloggers' Rights!


On Mothertalkers:

Preschool and Kindergarten Readiness

On Watching Impossibly Thin Women at Breakfast

Some Texans Up in Arms Over Straight-Ticket Voting

Monday Open Thread

Remembering Marie

On Street Prophets:

Monday Vigil: Advent Hope

Wanker Of The Day

It's past six o'clock and time for coffee

News from the 'Net

The Prayer Closet, a daily prayer request thread